In the same way you would design an ideal-state (aspirational) process before bringing it back to the future-state (something that could be realistically implemented now), you would do the same with a customer journey.
Many of the project team members in Grand Union were leaseholders (not necessarily with Grand Union) and had first-hand experience of the service charge process as a customer. Those that weren’t, were able to draw parallels between the customer experience of paying services charges and paying your council tax. No-one really wants to part with the money, but everyone recognises the necessity to do so. Therefore, the aim is to make the process as transparent, simple and pain-free as possible.
The project team in Grand Union identified a number of key elements for the ideal service charge customer journey:
Communicate with customers according to their preferences
Whilst digital by default seems to be the trend, understanding customer communication preferences and then sending information that way was acknowledged to be important. This also included the need to include service charge information on the customer’s portal.
Ensure that any payments are spread evenly throughout the year, with direct debits not changing from one month to another
Often housing providers will adjust the customer’s direct debit in the 3rd or 4th quarter of the year to reflect any under/overpayments. This can create unpredictability for people who are managing their household budget. The solution to this is to ensure that estimate charges are as accurate as possible, but there will always be anomalies that mean charge adjustments are necessary. The team discussed a preference for rolling over credits/debits into the next service charge billing cycle, thereby keeping the annual payments static for customers.
Keep annual payments as affordable as possible and manage the expectations of customers moving into a Grand Union property
This means ensuring that accurate service charge estimates were provided to customers as soon as possible when looking to move into a property. This enables them to work out the true affordability of living in a Grand Union property. This also meant earlier consultation with the development team pre-handover of a scheme or site to eliminate any costly and unnecessary build components that may hike up the annual maintenance charge.
Avoid leaps in charges from one year to another
There are unavoidable and intermittent large spends that any housing organisation will have to incur maintaining properties. These are usually big-ticket components such as roof replacements, lifts and cyclical decorations to the outside and communal areas of the building. These costs can be managed via a sinking/reserve fund that each block can build up (like a savings account) which keeps payments for customers level and predictable.
These ideal-state principles were captured onto a customer journey map (shown below) and were then used to inform the design of the end-to-end process for service charges. The whole experience influenced the scope of the process design. Without completing the exercise, sinking/reserve funds would not have been in scope for the project and the development involvement would have been far more light touch.